Abe Weiner (1917 – 1993)
Posted by M.R.N. on May 1, 2014
Remembrance
Survival
Monday Washday
The Old And The New
Of Ants And Men
Green Oasis
Pittsburgh
The Hill District
Still Life
Spring Composition
Spring Landscape
View From Window
Variations On A City
untitled
Series: Summer
Decay And Restoration
The Sign Painter
City With Leaf
Adam And Eve
Beam
Rose
Between Worlds
Disintegration
Fall Leaf
Shell
Transitory Force
Transient Worlds
String Quartet
Themes On A City
6 Responses to “Abe Weiner (1917 – 1993)”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
AMERICAN GALLERY 
Vincenzo said
In my opinion, Abe Weiner’s painting is a lovely genre of surrealism.
Bruce said
Sometimes I am frustrated here because I do not have the artistic expertise to pinpoint and properly phrase what I want to say about certain artwork. This is a prime example. I will try anyway but of course what I am going to say will sound trite and simplistic.
First, every single one of these paintings is interesting. By that, I don’t just mean attracting and holding one’s interest. What I mean is, each one makes you stop and think about what is being shown, not shown, partially shown, or merely hinted at. Why is the artist combining these images? Ok, that one is obvious – the combinations are meant to be thought-provoking and may contain actual messages – but it’s more than that.
For example, why did he choose to blend (and I mean blend, not just juxtaposition) certain images in certain ways? Why are some objects tilted, angled, or curved (like the tree growing out of the rock with leaves and limbs blending into matching clouds)? Why does he position certain things (like the cityscape seen through an opening in rock that resembles an ant hole)?
Why is Pittsburgh floating in air? Why are tiny houses dominated by vague, looming skyscrapers in the background, sized out of proportion? The monumental animal skull that dwarfs village ruins indicates something the painter had in mind, but what about the very large leaf? Speaking of leaf, look at the way it wraps around those homes – protecting or menacing? And is that a shell or an eye?
And the way these are done, the technique and the subject matter displayed, are intriguing.
Every one of these paintings is a keeper for me. I just wish I could explain better as to why.
Vincenzo said
I agree with Briam, about the many questions that elicit these paintings, which, to me, that he could respond only to the author, if he were still alive. When the observer is confronted with surreal works, with scenarios lend themselves to various interpretations, usually asks: “What do you mean the artist?”. According to me you should know a little about psychology, because so many things come into play related all’incoscio artist. Often these are ideas taken from his dreams, but it could also be a state of trance, very common in certain artists. In this regard, I am reminded of an anecdote about Dali, when at the beginning of the thirties of last century, he made an exhibition of his paintings in a gallery in London. Among the guests there was also Freud, who was asked for an opinion as a psychoanalyst, and he replied: “This man definitely has problems.”
Bruce said
Heh, very good, Vincenzo. 🙂
Kim Weiner said
Hi Suzay,
I was just checking back about Abe Weiner?. I realize you are busy, but how soon do you think you might get to him?
Suzay Lamb said
12 days ago 🙂