Posted by Suzay Lamb on March 3, 2013
This entry was posted on March 3, 2013 at 11:18 am and is filed under BROOK Alexander. Tagged: Alexander Brook, Bette Davis, Katharine Hepburn, Merle Oberon, Peggy Bacon, Reginald Marsh. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.































Bruce said
I hope he finally found a way to tell his daughter whatever she needed to know. I also hope he delegated the last task!
Regarding his portraiture, I did not recognize any of his famous subjects at first glance. Even after reading the title, scrolling back up, and saying “Oh yeah. I guess” it was tough.
This fellow would not be very high up on my list of American Masters. His work looks bizarre and even amateurish to me.
Which leads me to make one more comment. Sometimes (in my opinion) we mistake a lack of talent for a distinctive artistic style. Could I draw as well as him? Certainly not. However, I bet thousands of art students in this nation could.
Why is it we shower accolades on artists without artistic greatness in the modern era? Yeah, yeah, eye of the beholder, I know.
Stu Mead said
I disagree, I think his work is terrific. I never heard of or saw his work before. thanks for finding it.
Bruce said
The man had difficulty drawing the human face, Stu, but I respect your right to disagree, of course. As I said, “eye of the beholder.”
Stu Mead said
I think his faces are lovely. He’s singing the blues not singing opera. It’s true: the eye of the beholder. I’ll admit I am a fan of the Art Student’s League and New York painting of the 20s and 30s.
At least he garnered a Wikipedia page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Brook
Suzay Lamb said
Alexander Brook’s article on Wikipedia is shorter than Stu Mead’s one! Haha